<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Singleton factory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghost23.de/2009/03/singleton-factory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghost23.de/2009/03/singleton-factory/</link>
	<description>A blog about Flash and stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:20:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven Busse</title>
		<link>http://www.ghost23.de/2009/03/singleton-factory/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven Busse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 11:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghost23.de/blog/?p=99#comment-57</guid>
		<description>hi Hristo,
yeah, please note, i&#039;m not a fan of Singletons. I just had this idea about separation of concerns and the fact, that you get compile-time errors with this approach and wanted to write it down.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Hristo,<br />
yeah, please note, i&#8217;m not a fan of Singletons. I just had this idea about separation of concerns and the fact, that you get compile-time errors with this approach and wanted to write it down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hdachev</title>
		<link>http://www.ghost23.de/2009/03/singleton-factory/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>hdachev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghost23.de/blog/?p=99#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Ooooh, you are going to meet resistance by publishing about Singletons.
Anyway one way to overcome the inheritance problem would be by abstraction, but you would lose the lazy instantiation, which is always kind of nice. I blogged about something similar a few weeks ago at
http://blog.controul.com/2009/02/the-much-dreaded-singleton/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooooh, you are going to meet resistance by publishing about Singletons.<br />
Anyway one way to overcome the inheritance problem would be by abstraction, but you would lose the lazy instantiation, which is always kind of nice. I blogged about something similar a few weeks ago at<br />
<a href="http://blog.controul.com/2009/02/the-much-dreaded-singleton/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.controul.com/2009/02/the-much-dreaded-singleton/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

